Where Does This Lead Us?

Assuming you read and studied the "Gun Camera Photo Fraud" essays, and now accept that the purported gun camera images are bogus, or at least highly suspicious, you may be asking yourself: Where does this lead us?

Consider the following observations, based primarily on the purported gun camera images in the IDF (Israel Defense Force) History Report.

First, whoever marked-up the "gun camera photos" in the IDF History Report, to note features on USS Liberty that plainly do not appear in the images, knew they were not images of USS Liberty.  This shows a conscious and intentional effort to produce fraudulent evidence.

Second, the IDF History Department has been caught red-handed perpetrating a fraud.  Analysis shows clearly that the IDF History Department produced a report containing fraudulent evidence.  This places a cloud of serious doubt over other information and evidence provided by the IDF History Department about the USS Liberty attack.

Third, this fraudulent evidence bolsters the premeditated attack and cover-up theory.  Why would an innocent party feel the need to produce and present fraudulent evidence?

Fourth, it shows either the ineptitude, inattentiveness or complicity of American investigative and intelligence services and agencies.  Why were they apparently unable to detect and call public attention to this crude and blatant deception?

Fifth, when combining the IDF History Report's deceptive images with the fake set of gun camera images found in Mr. Cristol's book and the Thames film, it brings to light that there is an ongoing effort by the IDF, and some of its supporters, to produce and use fabricated information to support the IDF's claim that the USS Liberty attack was nothing more than an innocent, albeit tragic mistake.

Finally, it is clear that the fraudulent gun camera images give an impression that the ship was difficult to identify.  This false impression is misleading and deceptive.  And as such, the fake images betray the IDF's claim of innocence: an innocent party has no need to produce and present fraudulent evidence to support one's innocence.